The Wrong Side of my Car

The blog that wants to go obsolete

25 Jun 2023

What’s the deal with those backyards?

Here is something awkward for urbanists over here: if you want to raise a kid in Auckland, you need a backyard.

No ifs and buts. Backyard.

Backyards in Grey Lynn. Being able to have a backyard in the middle of a city is perhaps one of the things that defines the ‘character’ of Auckland.

And that is very unfortunate. We keep going on and on about how we need to live smaller. Build apartments. The solution to housing crises always seems to converge to 6-storey apartment blocks*1, and Auckland is no exception.

But then you have to find people who are willing to live without a backyard.

Maybe you’re now reading this from your inner city apartment *2, and thinking, yes I’ll like my apartment a lot, thank you very much. I know. I have been there.

Maybe you even live there with children. Again possible, but you must have noticed that despite having so many people nearby, there are curiously few children around.

Age pyramid in city centre (2018) *3

Or maybe you did not notice this, because this doesn’t contrast with anywhere else in Auckland. You’re exceedingly unlikely to see kids outside, unless you drive to a mall or playground. And I mean drive. Let me come back to that later.

Perspective

And this is the moment to point out that this blog is set in Auckland. There’s a few unique warts to high density living here:

Unitary plan map, central Auckland. Note the pink and dark brown ribbons following the arterials, these represent zones where apartments are most likely to be built.

All of this means that these high density options come with worse compromises than what seems to be the case elsewhere. Compromises which get more difficult to deal with after you start a family.

So, you get a backyard

Let’s remind ourselves of two key properties of backyards:

  1. You don’t need to deal with the street environment to go there, or while being there.
  2. It is close enough so you can casually go there if you want, even for just a few minutes.

So what?

‘Street environment’, of course, is an euphemism for ‘car traffic’.

The combination of these two is a substantial improvement in quality of life. It gives both children and their parents the possibility to just be, at the same time, without one needing to just hang around and wait until the other is done being.

Now, there is always that guy asking, if you got kids, why don’t you want to spend time with them? I’ll talk about that later.

Oh, and one more thing:

  1. It is outdoors.

Being inside is quite limiting — have you ever tried to play soccer, or tag, inside? Judging from toddlers, being lazy seems to be an acquired taste, and they will let you know if you keep them inside. There is also that issue that your eyes will grow to the wrong shape if you don’t spend time in daylight as a toddler*5

Not that young kids are the only people who enjoy some outdoor space, but not having it available definitely stings a lot more after you have kids.

And we cannot finish this discussion without mentioning COVID-19 lockdowns. Holy shit, imagine being cooped up for a few months inside an apartment, instead of inside a backyard.

But not everybody has children

This is true, but only if you look at one snapshot in time. If you look over a few decades, most people will have young children at some point in their lives. And usually quite early in their career. If that moment forces them to move out to some suburban house, it will act like a filter, and only the small set of yuppies and childless couples will be in those apartments. (which you can clearly see on that age pyramid above).

And thus the plan of housing more people in apartments or other high density housing will not scale up to a meaningful part of the population.

So, as cliché as it is, we now have to ask the question:

Where will the children play?

So, first for context, about the 10 or so years living here:

In Aukland, I have never seen children play on the street.

Not a single time. Never. Heck, I hardly ever see adults hanging out on the street.

And even playgrounds, do you have a playground without a parking lot nearby? It is very common to find these completely empty even on sunny weekend days. So people drive somewhere, often to the larger parks like Onepoto Domain down at Onewa Road, or Eric Armishaw Park between Point Chevalier and Waterview. And have you seen those parking lots? It is an absolute zoo over there.

What this tells you is that children cannot go to a playground, unless their parents bring them. An observation confirmed by our household travel survey *6.

Look back at those key properties of a backyard. You see the problem? You have to organise a trip, typically a car trip, to let your kids play outside. The notion that yeah families ought to live like that, is insane.

But, won't somebody please think of the adults?

Where will the adults play?

And you know what, an urban designer by the name of Donald Appleyard thought of this fifty years ago. You may have seen these graphs with ‘social connections’, perhaps the coloured versions from this Streetfilms video, “Revisiting Donald Appleyard's Livable Streets”.

Neighboring and visiting. *7

And this was more than fifty years ago. You see those dots labelled “Where people gather”? You know what we call that these days? Loitering. And you’re not supposed to do it. We’ve probably gotten a tier or two below that “heavy traffic” street by now.

There is a related graph, of the area that people consider ‘home’. Not the one everyone is sharing all the time, however I think this one is the money shot. This is why people can’t live with a backyard anymore.

Home territory.

So we can add a fourth point to our list of backyard key properties.

  1. It is part of your ‘home territory’.

Look at those tiny boxes around those apartments. Have you ever seen a more clear visual of apartments being claustrophobic?

Choices

Why don’t people want to live in apartments? Why would they even go as far as opposing apartments that they’re never going to live in anyway?

This question is very similar to that of why people choose to drive cars. In theory there is a choice, but in practice this choice is very limited by what is available right now. Right now, the limiting factor for apartments is the lack of streets that enable the kind of lifestyle you’d have in an apartment. What Appleyard calls Livable Streets.

All of this said, there are spaces in Auckland which genuinely provide a viable alternative to a backyard. They are just so uncommon that for most people their existence doesn’t matter when looking for a home.

One of them is Wynyard Quarter. You can go there and observe this in real life. But if you want one of those apartments… if you have to ask you can’t afford it.


(*1) 

Probably the most well-known example of this was the Khrushchevkas, also known as Commie blocks. These were built in response to, you guessed it, a severe housing shortage.

Another infamous collection of 6-storey buildings was built in Paris by Baron Haussmann.

(*2) 

The inner city is not the only place where you can build apartments, but people in places like Te Atatū are currently experiencing the hard way why the inner city is one of the more sensible places to build apartments.

(*3) 

Go to Auckland Counts and look at the city centre information sheet.

I mean, look at that age pyramid. Children (0–14 year olds) in the city centre are about 4 to 5% of the population, while over the entire city, it is around 20% (in the 2018 census). So living there with children is sort of niche.

The hollow bars represent the 2013 census, and you can clearly see the young adults age in place. It is quite possible that some of them in fact have children while still living in the city centre. In which case the council will soon have a shit ton of trouble because…

This is a town centre of more than 30,000 people, with no primary schools. That is right, if you live in the city centre right now with kids, you have to somehow get them to school in the suburbs. Bringing a 5- or 6-year old to a primary school in the suburbs sounds like the exact logistical nightmare that would make me want to move out. Right. Now.

(*4) 

Another peculiarity is that they almost always come with a body corporate. This tends to be surprising to many people, including me, but also including people who live in other New Zealand cities.

I also noticed a while ago that a lot of our existing stock was built during the leaky homes crisis, adding to the list of unfortunate things poisoning opinions about high density living.

(*5) 

Which causes nearsightedness. Some Asian countries have a truly frightening incidence, well over 90% for young people in some cities. These also just so happen to be cities where fertility rate is rapidly dropping towards 0.

And it is not just a benign case of needing glasses. Your eyes don’t focus properly because they literally have the wrong shape. Later in life this often comes with various sorts of gradual damage to eyes.

(*6) 

New Zealand Household Travel Survey. Toddlers in particular are extremely unlikely to move around by anything else than a car. The 0–4 year olds I actually see on the street are people doing a walk with a baby stroller.

(*7) 

The original is Appleyard, D., 1969. “The Environmental Quality of City Streets: The Residents’ Viewpoint.” Journal of the American Planning Association, 35, 84-101.

No comments

Post a Comment